Related Content
Are You Testing The Quality Into Your Software? The test team shouldn’t have the onus to improve the software quality, rather the quality should already be built into the software. A few subtle indicators can reveal if the quality isn’t being built into the software. |
||
Requirements Discipline: Avoiding “Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts" Absent an effective requirements baseline it is difficult to distinguish clarifications and error correction from enhancements and changes to the original ask. |
||
A Culture of Criticism in Software Companies Author Qaiser Munir outlines his experience with the culture of blame in software development toward those considered to be responsible for "quality". |
||
Reaping the True Value of Exploratory Testing Exploratory testing best practices should be accommodated for and communicated upfront, with early stakeholder buy in in order to ensure you get the most from your efforts. |
||
Balancing Testing and Delivery Times in Software Development So how can developers and their teams optimize testing procedures with the modern tools and tech available to them? Here, we will explore optimizing testing through experimentation to meet delivery deadlines and adapt to challenges in software development.
|
||
A Tale of Toxic Sponsorship It is difficult to succeed without effective sponsorship—and almost impossible if your sponsor is toxic, as this true tale explains. |
||
Test, Test, Test Test, test, test. This is a phrase that has caught everyone’s attention this year as we grapple to mitigate COVID-19. The WHO states that testing is the only way out, as we cannot fight the pandemic blindfolded. |
||
Test Teams Evaluation to Improve Effectiveness Evaluating a test team member’s abilities is crucial in recognizing deficiencies within the team, and it provides an opportunity to outline a strategy to remedy the weaknesses. Selecting the proper method for evaluating the test team’s abilities is vital. |