There were compelling reasons to replace the legacy system: It was fragile, arcane, and difficult to support; evolving regulations required frequent changes; design debt makes changes expensive and error-prone; the hardware platform was expensive and beyond end of life; and the few people who could support it were aging and eligible for retirement.
Because the system was mission-critical, the project to replace it was perceived late the day it began. A cursory review of requirements was performed and a replacement product quickly procured. A slideshow for executives explained the benefits of a modern system in terms of increased functionality and flexibility as well as decreased cost and risk. A budget guess and crude schedule were thrown together and approved, and the project began.
These paragraphs could be in the summary of several legacy replacement project autopsy reports I’ve written over the last ten years.
There are several classic challenges with legacy systems:
The risks associated with these challenges require careful consideration and planning, but when an organization realizes a mission-critical platform is “burning,” it’s tempting to set aside good project management practices and push forward recklessly. I’ve seen this result in huge schedule delays, significant cost overruns, data problems, organizational chaos, and many unhappy faces in the executive suite.
Teams that performed well did several things that made a difference:
When systems must be replaced quickly, it can encourage sloppy and counterproductive practices. Take the time to understand the problem, plan and estimate the solution, and organize your project for success. The executive suite may not like how much the project will cost, but they usually prefer a painful truth to a rushed fiction.